Archives For September 2009

Have Another Tilt at It

September 30, 2009 — Leave a comment

wilson.jpg

Nathan Wilson summarizes a position he obviously doesn’t take:

People are raped in this world, and rape is evil. Because evil exists, there must be no God.

But then he shows where that position ends up:

Because there is no God—no authoritative standard over creation—the badness of rape downgrades to a mere matter of societal taste. Ethnic cuisine, ethnic ethics. In God’s absence rape is no longer fundamentally evil. In our country, you’ll get confined to a cell (if caught and convicted), but that just means we enforce our taste, not that our taste has any real authority over anyone else.

—N. D. Wilson, Notes from the Tilt-A-Whirl

Picture 2.png

I’m still thoroughly enjoying—and receiving historical instruction from—Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, 1859–2009.

I just got through the major fight liberal-moderate president Duke McCall had in the 1950s with a group of liberal-moderate faculty. McCall won, and because he was not viewed as liberal, rank and file Southern Baptists viewed his victory as a purge of unsound theology from the school. But they weren’t quite right. Wills’ little line at the end of this paragraph is brilliant:

Herschel Hobbs’s assessment prevailed widely: “This was Southern Baptist Theological Seminary’s finest hour as she stood in the breach and said to modernism and its kind that it shall go no further in Southern Baptist institutions and life.” McCall’s purge had saved the school and the denomination from liberalism. The orthodox soon discovered, however, that it was not a case of once saved, always saved.

Jesus and Adam Smith

September 29, 2009 — 3 Comments

From American Vision:

What would Jesus have done if confronted with the new technology [of horseless carriages]? Would He have endorsed the mass production of the automobile when it was first introduced to the American public knowing that it was a polluter? Actually, Jesus would have said little. He would have allowed common sense and market forces to determine how the new technology would be used.

This troubles me. Jesus was not a Republican, much less a free-market fiscal conservative. Neither, of course, was Jesus a Democrat. Though He cared for the poor, it was more important that “the poor have good news preached to them” (Mt 11:4).

This doesn’t mean the Bible has nothing to say about economics. Far from it. But it does mean that we ought to be careful claiming Jesus for our causes. “You thought you that I was one like yourself” (Ps 50:20), God told Israel. Israel was wrong.

During my five years as a research assistant in the BJU Library I read thousands of articles, and I ran into a bunch of causes people had enlisted God for. I began keeping a “God told me to do it” file. Enjoy:Screen shot 2009-09-29 at 9.55.52 AM.png

Thrilla in Greenvilla, Round 3

September 23, 2009 — 1 Comment

I challenged my good friend Brian Collins to a public discussion: electronic books vs. paper books. I started off by listing all the stuff I’d bought from Logos and other electronic sources. (I got one moderately nasty comment that I did not post, someone marveling at how much I’d spent. Remember that 1) I was single during most of those purchases, 2) I was in the foundational stages of building my ministerial library, and 3) a third of the money I spent came from one gift at the end of my M.A.)

Brian Collins responded to my first post by listing (from Zotero, I imagine) all the books and articles he’s gotten for free.

Of course, I could do the same. I have countless electronic articles that I’ve saved in topic folders and about 150 electronic books (see images below) that I’ve gotten for free online, too. And they’re not all public domain. Some are quite valuable. Piper, for example, makes most of his works available for free online (don’t miss this little helpful book).

Screen shot 2009-09-23 at 10.08.50 AM.png Screen shot 2009-09-23 at 10.09.01 AM.png Screen shot 2009-09-23 at 10.09.07 AM.png

Brian’s point is well made, and I agree with it completely: a not-insignificant amount of books you could buy on Logos are available for free from Google Books—so do some research and thinking before you plunk down the cash.

The value of Logos over Google Books is having completely clean, copyable, and searchable tagged texts. Bible references and even topics are coded into those tags, and it’s nice to have all your best resources in one place. But how much is that worth to you for public domain books?

And that brings us to the real issue, books that aren’t public domain and that will cost you real money whether you buy them from Logos or Amazon.

I’ll list the pros for electronic books. I’m aware of the cons, and I’m eager for both of you readers to be aware of them, too, but I’ll let Brian tackle those.

Pros for Electronic Books

  1. Cost: buying commentaries and reference works in sets can be a lot more cost-effective than buying them in print. Case in point: the IVP Essential Reference Collection. I got it for $80. That would buy me about three of the nicer books in the collection.
  2. Convenience: I bought the paper version of BDAG at my Greek teacher’s recommendation, but I found I never pulled the thing down to look up words. BibleWorks’ auto-info window was just too tempting, so I sold the book and bought the electronic version. I now use BDAG much more frequently. Same goes for just about any reference work in my library.
  3. Portability: For missionaries, which Brian is likely to be, it’s a no-brainer. Evangelists who read books (like Keven Brownfield, who told me ten years ago that he adores Logos)—same thing.
  4. Searchability: I don’t remember where to find things anymore (of course, you could also call that a con). I just remember wording, and I can search for it.
  5. Quality: The big Logos packages contain some fluff—and even some liberal claptrap. But overall, students who buy the Gold package, for example, are guaranteed some excellent commentaries, theologies, and reference works. If undergraduate ministerial students are left to their own devices buying analog books, they won’t choose as wisely as Logos has already done for them.

Welcome back to Free Cartoon Friday!

Check back each week for a free cartoon I failed to sell to Christian pastors’ magazines in 2005!

Click image for full size.

http://www.markandlauraward.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/07-recooperate.png

George vs. (?) Beckwith

September 17, 2009 — 1 Comment

I found this video deeply disturbing and disappointing. I love the gospel, and to see it obscured by a former ETS president and the author of an excellent commentary on Galatians—of all books—was a painful frustration. In the discussion, held before an audience at Wheaton College, Timothy George, a Southern Baptist ecumenist, talks with Frances Beckwith, the ETS president who reverted to Roman Catholism three years ago.

In Galatians 2, Paul describes how he opposed Peter (yes, that Peter) publicly when merely by neglecting to eat with Gentiles he denied the universal scope of the gospel. What if Peter got on stage at the Jerusalem Council and had a friendly chat with a prominent Judaizer—being careful to emphasize all of the areas of agreement they share and chiding Paul for not maximizing those agreements? It’s safe to say that Paul’s reaction would be even more intense.

Of what were the Judaizers guilty? That’s a debated issue, but Paul’s comments in Galatians 2 happen to be the only place where the word Joudaize (ἰουδαΐζειν) is used in the NT. And in that context, their sins sound equivalent to that of Rome: they were adding accretions to the gospel. As George himself once said to Father Richard John Neuhaus, “You have the gospel with a surcharge.”

The gospel will cost you everything (Mt. 13:44-45) and nothing (Eph. 2:8–9); but it comes with no human-devised surcharge. No sacraments, no magisterium, no human intermediaries of any sort. Evangelicals and Catholics cannot get Together until these surcharges are dropped.

George wrote in his New American Commentary volume on Galatians,

No one should appeal to Paul’s example here as a pretext for disrupting the peace of any congregation or denomination over trivial theological issues or personality quirks. But neither should anyone take comfort in Peter’s dissembling action when we are really confronted with a situation that calls for a clear, uncompromising stand for the faith once delivered. (p. 179)

The current day calls for a clear, uncompromising stand on the faith that many evangelicals have lost and that the Catholic Church has overcharged for.

This book is just full of bons mots:

wilson.jpg

The Greeks were right. Live in fear of a grinding end and a dank hereafter. Unless you know a bigger God, or better yet, are related to Him by blood.

—N. D. Wilson, Notes from the Tilt-A-Whirl

BJU Seminary Retreat

September 15, 2009 — 2 Comments

0912091010a.jpg

The Father of lights gave a good gift to me this past weekend, a retreat to the Wilds with most of my fellow BJU Seminary students.

I enjoyed the preaching, the God-honoring music, the many discussions with individual professors, the conversations with other students, the faculty testimonies, and even the Q&A session (something I often find myself dreading in similar gatherings).

Dr. Hankins, president of the Seminary, did a fine job of corralling the Q&A, trying to keep it on track while letting students speak and ask plenty of questions of their teachers. Not an easy task! The discussion focused on some difficult areas of Christian worship practice.

As the discussion progressed, I became increasingly convinced that we all could have gotten some good help from theologian John Frame.

Frame looks at all ethical questions from three perspectives, because ethics for him comprises three elements: a person applying a norm to a situation.

So, like my other reader, let’s say you’re asking, “Should I have Christian ska in my church worship? CCM Magazine said in 1999 that it’s pretty cool.” Let’s just ask one diagnostic question in each of the three categories to help us find an answer:

  1. Person: Does it violate your conscience?
  2. Norm: What does Scripture say about the purpose of church music?
  3. Situation: What does ska communicate in the culture(s) of the people in my church?

Remember, that’s just one question for each category. We could and should ask many others. Do I have a history of being defiled by non-Christian ska? What are the norms built into the creation of the human ear (i.e., is there a decibel limit I should probably impose in our church)? What do my elders think about Christian ska?

And, as Frame often points out, the categories tend to collapse into each other. The real reason I knew to ask about conscience is that Scripture tells me it’s important (Rom. 14:23). And I certainly can’t read the norm in Scripture independently from my cultural situation.

I stood up during the Q&A and asked a question focusing on the third category: “Would you agree that music is partially culturally relative—that is, appropriate church music in Botswana will sound different from that of Kazakhstan? If you do agree, how do you select which music in our culture is appropriate for worship?”

I think the answer is complicated by the fact that our “situation” includes, rightfully, a long Western tradition of church music and a shorter tradition of evangelical music. The very culture of the US has been influenced by the church, broadly speaking. This is not true of other world cultures.

What do you think?

The Thrilla in Greenvilla!

September 11, 2009 — 2 Comments

Picture 2.png

In another vain attempt to stoke controversy and therefore grow my blog readership beyond you two, I’ve provoked my good friend Brian Collins to bring our long-standing fight into public view, into a blog boxing match as it were. The fight could be summarized in a few ways: print vs. pixels, analog vs. digital, Gutenberg vs. Gates (no, Jobs!).

To introduce this series of pugilistic blog jabs, I’m going to merely list some of the facts. I’ll ask Brian to do the same on his blog.

In this corner, I’m the guy who’s invested a lot of money into electronic books:

I also have BibleWorks 7 (which, full disclosure, I got for free in order to teach seminars on it—though I purchased version 5 in 2002). I purchased two modules for BibleWorks, however:

I’ve also laid out a bit of cash ($40?) for a pretty good collection of quality books in WordSearch format—which I subsequently copied into Word documents and put on my Kindle 2 so I could ditch WordSearch.

In fact, the Kindle might as well go in this list, because I spent $359 for the privilege of reading my electronic books in a convenient format.

And I should note that I got better prices on a lot of these than you can right now because 1) I bought some on pre-publication status; 2) I had an education discount for the Logos Gold package; and 3) I buy many things from a shady-looking man in the back of a van in an Internet alley (namely Rejoice Christian Software—who knows what kind of extortion he’s guilty of to get those prices!).

However, let me state here categorically that I refuse, as a matter of principle, to pay Logos $60 for their Mac engine. That’s beyond the pale.

Grand Total!

So, including the electronic resources that I traded my print copies for, I have spent approximately $3,602 on electronic books since 2002. That’s $514 a year, though a small amount of it came from gifts. And, of course, I spent a good deal of money on print books during that time, as well. That’s on a BJU GA and then staff salary—which I make no complaints about, because look what I managed to get out of it, largely by not going to McDonald’s! The Lord has been generous to me, and I thank Him.

I have reasons why I elected to make this outlay. I’ll get into those after Brian lists off his electronic purchases.

I threw the first punch. Now, my own face is ready.

Welcome back to Free Cartoon Friday!

Check back each week for a free cartoon I failed to sell to Christian pastors’ magazines in 2005!

Click image for full size.

Any real cartoonists out there who are willing to put my ideas in more appealing visual form and sell them?